What is the term for concluding too quickly without sufficient evidence?

The term for concluding too quickly without sufficient evidence is hasty generalizations. This occurs when an individual draws a broad conclusion based on a small or unrepresentative sample of evidence. For instance, if someone meets a few rude individuals from a particular city and then asserts that everyone from that city is rude, they are committing a hasty generalization. This error in reasoning is critical to identify because it can lead to misconceptions and inaccurate beliefs about groups, events, or situations.

In contrast, circular reasoning involves supporting a claim with a premise that reformulates the claim itself, creating a loop without providing real evidence. False dichotomy refers to presenting a situation as having only two alternatives when other options may exist. Overgeneralization occurs when a conclusion is applied too broadly, but it may not explicitly imply the rushed nature of the conclusion as hasty generalization does. Understanding the precise nature of these terms differentiates hasty generalization as the accurate answer in this context.